[Bug fortran/82568] [6/7/8] ICE with do-loop inside BLOCK inside omp

2017-11-04 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82568 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/82568] [6/7/8] ICE with do-loop inside BLOCK inside omp

2017-10-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82568 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- As I said, the standard doesn't cover it, so what it will say about it is unclear. One thing are non-saved non-common non-use_assoc vars inside of the BLOCK, for those defining them as automatic variables

[Bug fortran/82568] [6/7/8] ICE with do-loop inside BLOCK inside omp

2017-10-20 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82568 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/82568] [6/7/8] ICE with do-loop inside BLOCK inside omp

2017-10-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82568 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug fortran/82568] [6/7/8] ICE with do-loop inside BLOCK inside omp

2017-10-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82568 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Oct 19 07:38:59 2017 New Revision: 253878 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253878=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/82568 * gfortran.h (gfc_resolve_do_iterator): Add a bool

[Bug fortran/82568] [6/7/8] ICE with do-loop inside BLOCK inside omp

2017-10-16 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82568 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|