https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83149
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Feb 23 17:55:13 2018
New Revision: 257938
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257938&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-23 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/83149
* trans-types.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83149
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Feb 23 16:22:28 2018
New Revision: 257934
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257934&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-23 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/83149
* trans-decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83149
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83149
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 09:42:54PM +, neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com
wrote:
>
> Perhaps this modification of comment 2 code is clearer.
ncell is never set.
> Put this in one file:
>
> module mod1
> in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83149
--- Comment #7 from Neil Carlson ---
Perhaps this modification of comment 2 code is clearer.
Put this in one file:
module mod1
integer :: ncells
end module
module mod2
contains
function get() result(array)
use mod1
real array(ncell
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83149
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 08:00:29PM +, neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com
wrote:
>
> I disagree (in part) with comment 4.
>
As you failed to quote the part that is disagreeable, it is
somewhat difficult to pu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83149
--- Comment #5 from Neil Carlson ---
I disagree (in part) with comment 4. Ncells is a valid specification statement
(see 7.1.11, par 2 (4), Fortran 2008). Its value need not be known at compile
time; only when the get() function is executed. I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83149
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83149
--- Comment #3 from Neil Carlson ---
Unlike comment 0 code, comment 2 code also gives an ICE with 7.2.1 and 6.4.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83149
--- Comment #2 from Neil Carlson ---
Here's another example. The ICE is coming at the same place, toplev.c:325, so
I think it may be the same underlying problem. Like the original example, the
ICE occurs only when the main program is in a separ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83149
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
11 matches
Mail list logo