https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83560
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83560
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Dec 29 19:25:31 2017
New Revision: 256034
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256034&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-12-29 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran/83560
* io
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83560
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Patch posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-12/msg00089.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83560
--- Comment #6 from urbanjost at comcast dot net ---
Thanks! As always, I am astonished at what has been accomplished. Fortran's
viability itself depends so much on the availability of an open compiler.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83560
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83560
--- Comment #4 from urbanjost at comcast dot net ---
Yes - just to confirm, I only found a problem with the missing plus with
INTEGER values printed without an explicit format. Everything I tried with
floating-point values (REAL and COMPLEX) confo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83560
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83560
--- Comment #2 from urbanjost at comcast dot net ---
Created attachment 42958
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42958&action=edit
NAMELIST integers exhibit same problem
PS:
An INTEGER in a NAMELIST shows the same issue (missin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83560
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
*** Bug 83561 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
