[Bug fortran/85786] [8/9 Regression] Segfault in associated intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85786 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/85786] [8/9 Regression] Segfault in associated intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85786 --- Comment #14 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Fri May 25 22:06:57 2018 New Revision: 260784 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260784=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-25 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/85786] [8/9 Regression] Segfault in associated intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85786 --- Comment #13 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Fri May 25 21:57:24 2018 New Revision: 260783 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260783=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-25 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/85786] [8/9 Regression] Segfault in associated intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85786 --- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Angus Gibson from comment #11) > Apologies if this is unrelated to the issue at hand (I don't quite > understand how everything is inter-related yet), but maybe it helps. First > up,

[Bug fortran/85786] [8/9 Regression] Segfault in associated intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85786 --- Comment #11 from Angus Gibson --- Apologies if this is unrelated to the issue at hand (I don't quite understand how everything is inter-related yet), but maybe it helps. First up, here's what valgrind says about the segfault: ...

[Bug fortran/85786] [8/9 Regression] Segfault in associated intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85786 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9) > If I am not mistaken (problem with the change log entry), the patch in > comment 5 has been included in revision r260414 (pr49636). Yes, you are right. I

[Bug fortran/85786] [8/9 Regression] Segfault in associated intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85786 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- If I am not mistaken (problem with the change log entry), the patch in comment 5 has been included in revision r260414 (pr49636).

[Bug fortran/85786] [8/9 Regression] Segfault in associated intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85786 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > Likely r251949. > > There are no changes within trans-intrinsic.c(gfc_conv_associated) > that correspond to that revision. My best guess with

[Bug fortran/85786] [8/9 Regression] Segfault in associated intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85786 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 06:47:49PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > > --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Likely r251949. > There are no changes within

[Bug fortran/85786] [8/9 Regression] Segfault in associated intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85786 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code