https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90350
Bug ID: 90350
Summary: ubound ICE on assumed size array even though explicit
bound is specified
Product: gcc
Version: 7.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: urbanjost at comcast dot net
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 46291
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46291&action=edit
call UBOUND(3f) with an assumed-size array but with an explicit size on the
upper bound
Even an assumed size array should be able to be passed to UBOUND if an explicit
size is specified (well, that is the way I read the standard :>). This problem
only appeared while transitioning some F77 code
to a modern syntax but it produced an ICE. Once updated completely the code
works great with gfortran, by the way. A reduced reproducer is attached. The
error is
write(*,*)'UPPER=',ubound(arr(:n))
internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_intrinsic_bound, at
fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:2735
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
The test has been reduced to the point where it is redundant to even call
UBOUND
but it still produces the ICE, which is what I assuming you want to look at;
but unless I encounter this in some other form consider this a low priority
request. As always, thanks!
