[Bug fortran/91726] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3612

2021-04-01 Thread jrfsousa at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91726 --- Comment #9 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Hi Paul! This seems to fix the ICE generated by using -ftrapv -fcheck=bounds Fixes "nelems" type and adds an optional assert to make sure it stays fixed. Best regards, José Rui diff --git

[Bug fortran/91726] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3612

2021-01-08 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91726 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to José Rui Faustino de Sousa from comment #7) > Hi all! > > Still ICEs with 9/10/11 using -ftrapv -fcheck=bounds > > Best regards, > José Rui Yes, indeed. This with those compile options module

[Bug fortran/91726] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3612

2020-05-06 Thread jrfsousa at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91726 José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jrfsousa at gmail dot com