https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91902
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITIN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91902
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91902
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|kargl at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #5 from ka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91902
--- Comment #4 from Georgy ---
The comment to the head of problem. The version I mentioned first was 9.2.0 but
actually I worked with 4.9.2. My bad.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91902
--- Comment #3 from Georgy ---
No, I have to directories which have name "gcc-9.2.0" and "gcc9.2.0". The
source code is inside "gcc-9.2.0", (In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> (In reply to Georgy from comment #0)
> > After configuring gcc (vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91902
--- Comment #2 from Georgy ---
No, I have two directories. One has name "gcc-4.9.2" and the other has name
"gcc4.9.2". The source code is inside "gcc-4.9.2". The folder "gcc4.9.2" is
empty and was made specially to use it as "prefix".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91902
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
