[Bug fortran/93338] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:282

2020-04-19 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93338 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > Likely another missing DECL_EXPR for variable-size stuff. TYPE_SIZE has > > (bitsizetype) (sizetype) _29 * 8 > > and _29 is released. This is confusing. G

[Bug fortran/93338] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:282

2020-04-19 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93338 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- Correction: Fails with -O, does not fail without optimization.

[Bug fortran/93338] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:282

2020-04-19 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93338 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig --- Works now, probably fixed by Paul's work on associate.

[Bug fortran/93338] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:282

2020-03-04 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93338 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.4 |8.5 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug fortran/93338] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:282

2020-01-21 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93338 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/93338] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:282

2020-01-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93338 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/93338] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:282

2020-01-20 Thread gs...@t-online.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93338 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #1 from G.