https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94943
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94943
--- Comment #5 from Andrea Mastellone ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> GCC 10.1 has been released.
When it will be available on Fedora 32 I will test it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94943
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94943
--- Comment #3 from Andrea Mastellone ---
Created attachment 48460
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48460&action=edit
simple test case which reproduces the bug
Here is a simple source code replying the bug. I have attached th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94943
--- Comment #2 from Andrea Mastellone ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> There is very little we can do without a minimum example that shows the
> problem. What you have attached cannot be compiled by anyone as
> deallocate_vars.f90 conta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94943
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94943
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Target Milestone|---
