https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96033
--- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 06:30:40PM +, sgk at troutmask dot
apl.washington.edu wrote:
>
> It isn't a matter of simply switching rules. It's a matter of bugs
> and whether the bug is reported. In the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96033
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 05:31:21PM +, skorzennik at cfa dot harvard.edu
wrote:
>
> I gave up on gfortran when the 64b record marker made it unusable for me. I'm
> not surprised it was fixed, but this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96033
--- Comment #7 from Sylvain Korzennik ---
Thanks for following up, Steve.
I gave up on gfortran when the 64b record marker made it unusable for me. I'm
not surprised it was fixed, but this pointed to poor decision making and
ignoring the need
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96033
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 04:10:38PM +, skorzennik at cfa dot harvard.edu
wrote:
>
> GCC is the single one that decides that old code is trash and needs to be
> rewritten. When 64b was introduced,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96033
--- Comment #5 from Sylvain Korzennik ---
Hi Kargl,
I am not interested in a protracted religious discussion, I simply do not use
gfortran for my work (research), but need to provides it form my users
(Smithsonian HPC cluster) as part of my
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96033
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96033
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
You can find a quite long discussion about legacy at
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/Ed8Mccy9zo8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96033
--- Comment #2 from Sylvain Korzennik ---
Merci Dominique.
Will transmit info to MVAPICH2 ppl.
The configuration script needs to be changed, this is not "faulty code", it is
a test code part of the package configuration specifically to test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96033
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID