https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255
Scott Boyce changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Boyce at engineer dot com
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255
--- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #8)
> New patch. This adds a bool component to gfc_forall_iterator so
> that an iterator with an index-name that shadows a variable from
> outer scope can be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
New patch. This adds a bool component to gfc_forall_iterator so
that an iterator with an index-name that shadows a variable from
outer scope can be marked. Shadowing only occurs when a type-spec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #6)
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 07:44:16PM +, jvdelisle at charter dot net wrote:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255
> >
> > --- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 07:44:16PM +, jvdelisle at charter dot net wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255
>
> --- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at charter dot net ---
> (In reply to kargl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at charter dot net ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #2)
> This issue depends on the fix for FORALL. In gfc_match_do in the concurrent
> section, one gets to
>
> m = match_forall_header (, );
>
> to match
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at charter dot net ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> This is related to PR78219.
>
> If someone takes up the challenge, then this show accept only
> standard conforming type specs. That is, INTEGER*4 should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #2)
> This issue depends on the fix for FORALL. In gfc_match_do in the concurrent
> section, one gets to
>
> m = match_forall_header (, );
>
> to match the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||78219
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
12 matches
Mail list logo
