https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a14691e924ea4a8277ea36df08b2f5359082bf62
commit r10-9444-ga14691e924ea4a8277ea36df08b2f5359082bf62
Author: Tobias Burnus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a6a62614a8ae4544770420416d1632d6c3d3f6e
commit r11-7551-g8a6a62614a8ae4544770420416d1632d6c3d3f6e
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
--- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus ---
Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-March/566366.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
--- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 50313
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50313&action=edit
Reduced testcase - run with 'gfortran file.f90' (seems to require
--enable-checking=yes)
The generated code ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #10)
> seen again with 20210227
I tried it with the attached file and the build.sh but calling gfortran
directly w/o mpif90 wrapper.
That's with --enable-checking=y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
--- Comment #11 from Matthias Klose ---
20210227 trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
--- Comment #10 from Matthias Klose ---
seen again with 20210227
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Can't reproduce with 20201005 10 branch or current trunk.
The 10 branch changed tree-nested.c e.g. in r10-8663, but I don't really see
any linear, lastprivate or reduction clauses in this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
>just checked with today's trunk and --enable-checking=yes,extra,rtl
> working there.
What was the failing version?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Klose ---
just checked with today's trunk and --enable-checking=yes,extra,rtl
working there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Dominique, are your compilers configured with --enable-checking=yes,extra,rtl
> ?
Only --enable-checking=yes (the default for experimental).
My instrumented compiler r11-5060 also works.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose ---
Dominique, are your compilers configured with --enable-checking=yes,extra,rtl ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
Created attachment 49605
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49605&action=edit
test case
that's my unsuccessful extraction attempt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
18 matches
Mail list logo
