[Bug gcov-profile/100980] [GCOV]The assignment statement in the “for” structure caused the wrong coverage

2022-07-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100980 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug gcov-profile/100980] [GCOV]The assignment statement in the “for” structure caused the wrong coverage

2022-07-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100980 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Fixed with r11-3302-g3696a50beeb73f4d.

[Bug gcov-profile/100980] [GCOV]The assignment statement in the “for” structure caused the wrong coverage

2022-07-04 Thread njuwy at smail dot nju.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100980 --- Comment #4 from Yang Wang --- (In reply to Yang Wang from comment #3) > The coverage is correct later version （gcov 11.1.0 and 12.1.0）,is it fixed? In version 12.1.0 -:1:#include -:2:extern void abort(void);

[Bug gcov-profile/100980] [GCOV]The assignment statement in the “for” structure caused the wrong coverage

2022-06-14 Thread njuwy at smail dot nju.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100980 Yang Wang changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug gcov-profile/100980] [GCOV]The assignment statement in the “for” structure caused the wrong coverage

2022-06-14 Thread njuwy at smail dot nju.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100980 Yang Wang changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/100980] [GCOV]The assignment statement in the “for” structure caused the wrong coverage

2021-06-10 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100980 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0