https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91087
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91087
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Mon Sep 9 20:27:05 2019
New Revision: 275547
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275547=gcc=rev
Log:
[Darwin, testsuite] Address PR91087 - XFAIL parts of pr16855.C.
The testcase is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91087
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Sep 1 19:17:16 2019
New Revision: 275279
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275279=gcc=rev
Log:
[Darwin, testsuite] Address PR91087 - XFAIL parts of pr16855.C.
The testcase is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91087
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|7.5
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91087
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Aug 4 13:12:26 2019
New Revision: 274092
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274092=gcc=rev
Log:
Darwin, testsuite, backport fix for 91087.
The testcase is failing to instrument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91087
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Thu Jul 25 18:12:03 2019
New Revision: 273809
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273809=gcc=rev
Log:
[Darwin, testsuite] Address PR91087 - XFAIL parts of pr16855.C.
The testcase is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91087
--- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe ---
sorry about the typos.
a) I meant to say that priorities would work in the case of single TU or LTO,
because that does the same thing.
b) the SysV spec says:
"Termination functions specified by users via
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91087
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
Target|
