[Bug go/61840] [4.9 regression] sync/atomic FAILs on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

2014-07-24 Thread LpSolit at netscape dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61840 Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug go/61840] [4.9 regression] sync/atomic FAILs on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

2014-07-18 Thread kdevel at vogtner dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61840 --- Comment #1 from Stefan kdevel at vogtner dot de --- After configuring with --with-arch-32=i686 I get PASS: runtime/pprof Aborted testing.tRunner [redacted]/gcc-4.9.1/bld/gcc-4.9.1/libgo/go/testing/testing.go:392 goroutine 1 [chan

[Bug go/61840] [4.9 regression] sync/atomic FAILs on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

2014-07-18 Thread ian at airs dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61840 --- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com --- Please tell us what kind of system you are running on and precisely how you ran configure. The error report doesn't make sense; it seems incomplete. I don't see how the test could

[Bug go/61840] [4.9 regression] sync/atomic FAILs on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

2014-07-18 Thread ian at airs dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61840 --- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com --- On the other bug Uros Bizjak suggests that perhaps the fix is https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg00309.html but that that patch does not work for you because your system

[Bug go/61840] [4.9 regression] sync/atomic FAILs on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

2014-07-18 Thread kdevel at vogtner dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61840 --- Comment #4 from Stefan kdevel at vogtner dot de --- Thanks for the comments. I had an old as (binutils 2.19) on the system. After replacing with binutils 2.22 GCC passes the test.