[Bug go/85429] Several gotools tests FAIL with Solaris as

2018-05-31 Thread ian at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85429 --- Comment #12 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Thu May 31 22:46:52 2018 New Revision: 261045 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261045=gcc=rev Log: PR go/85429 Various backports from mainline: libgo: update to

[Bug go/85429] Several gotools tests FAIL with Solaris as

2018-05-01 Thread ian at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85429 --- Comment #11 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Tue May 1 14:08:44 2018 New Revision: 259797 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259797=gcc=rev Log: PR go/85429 cmd/go: support more Solaris assembler syntaxes

[Bug go/85429] Several gotools tests FAIL with Solaris as

2018-05-01 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85429 --- Comment #10 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 44043 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44043=edit proposed patch Here's what I came up with: tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11 and sparc-sun-solaris2.11, both with as and

[Bug go/85429] Several gotools tests FAIL with Solaris as

2018-04-30 Thread ian at airs dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85429 --- Comment #9 from Ian Lance Taylor --- I suppose if worst comes to worst we can try it both ways.

[Bug go/85429] Several gotools tests FAIL with Solaris as

2018-04-30 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85429 --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor --- > Do you think you could work out a patch that handles the various different > cases? Sure, if I can figure out how to determine whether or

[Bug go/85429] Several gotools tests FAIL with Solaris as

2018-04-29 Thread ian at airs dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85429 --- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Do you think you could work out a patch that handles the various different cases?

[Bug go/85429] Several gotools tests FAIL with Solaris as

2018-04-29 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85429 --- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor --- > Should be fixed on tip, requested permission to backport to GCC 8 branch. It's fixed on sparc, but the Solaris/x86 with as failures remain

[Bug go/85429] Several gotools tests FAIL with Solaris as

2018-04-27 Thread ian at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85429 --- Comment #5 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Fri Apr 27 18:44:28 2018 New Revision: 259721 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259721=gcc=rev Log: PR go/85429 cmd/go: add Solaris assembler syntax for gccgo

[Bug go/85429] Several gotools tests FAIL with Solaris as

2018-04-27 Thread ian at airs dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85429 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/85429] Several gotools tests FAIL with Solaris as

2018-04-27 Thread ian at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85429 --- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Fri Apr 27 18:01:00 2018 New Revision: 259719 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259719=gcc=rev Log: PR go/85429 cmd/go: add Solaris assembler syntax for gccgo

[Bug go/85429] Several gotools tests FAIL with Solaris as

2018-04-18 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85429 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor --- > Does the SPARC Solaris assembler support a syntax like > > .section ".go.buildid",#exclude > > ? That's what gas seems to support for

[Bug go/85429] Several gotools tests FAIL with Solaris as

2018-04-17 Thread ian at airs dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85429 --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Does the SPARC Solaris assembler support a syntax like .section ".go.buildid",#exclude ? That's what gas seems to support for compatibility. Does that syntax work for x86?