[Bug go/91781] [10 regression] r275691 breaks go test "reflect"

2019-09-17 Thread ian at airs dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91781 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/91781] [10 regression] r275691 breaks go test "reflect"

2019-09-17 Thread ian at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91781 --- Comment #5 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Tue Sep 17 20:24:00 2019 New Revision: 275813 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275813=gcc=rev Log: PR go/91781 reflect: promote integer closure return to full word

[Bug go/91781] [10 regression] r275691 breaks go test "reflect"

2019-09-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91781 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug go/91781] [10 regression] r275691 breaks go test "reflect"

2019-09-16 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91781 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- For reflect to work there needs to be support for go closures in libffi.

[Bug go/91781] [10 regression] r275691 breaks go test "reflect"

2019-09-16 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91781 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Sorry, I missed this was a new test case. And no, it still doesn't work with current trunk.

[Bug go/91781] [10 regression] r275691 breaks go test "reflect"

2019-09-16 Thread ian at airs dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91781 --- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Oh, never mind, this is a new test in r275691, this code has probably never worked on ppc64be.

[Bug go/91781] [10 regression] r275691 breaks go test "reflect"

2019-09-16 Thread ian at airs dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91781 --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Does this work at SVN revision r275611?