--- Comment #7 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-21 20:27
---
Subject: Bug 42321
Author: rearnsha
Date: Sun Mar 21 20:27:00 2010
New Revision: 157609
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157609
Log:
PR target/42321
* arm.c (arm_output_epilog
--- Comment #6 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-21 15:58
---
testing fix
--
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|u
--- Comment #5 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-14 16:21 ---
I took a cursory look at this case . This looks like a bug in the
backend specifically in arm_output_epilogue where the epilogue code
isn't designed to cope for restoring disjoint sets of registers from
the stack when
--- Comment #4 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-09 16:55 ---
This occurs with arm-eabi cross as well.
Ramana
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #3 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-07 15:55
---
I can confirm both of these issues.
in asm statements GCC currently just treats 'q4' and 'd8' as aliases for s16
(which of course is just a 32-bit register); there's currently no way of
expressing that a larger en
--- Comment #2 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-07 15:52 ---
Also appears with trunk as of today.
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com 2009-12-07
14:42 ---
Modifying the program to list q-registers in the clobber list provides even
more interesting results:
//
void f()
{
asm volatile("veor d8, d8, d8" : : :"q4","q5","q7");
}
/***
