https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692
--- Comment #5 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Mine. Mine supports 33. Don't expect it to go past 40. Most folks won't. In
10-30 years, maybe we might need to update to 50, but we can do that then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692
--- Comment #4 from David ---
(In reply to m...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #3)
> This test case isn't portable. If upped to 40 then it would be more
> portable.
What platform supports more than 30 operands?
As near as I can see,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692
David gccbugzilla at limegreensocks dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law law at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Dec 8 21:58:23 2014
New Revision: 218494
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218494root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/61692
* cfgexpand.c
