https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102982
--- Comment #6 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
>
> fixup_cfg already removes write-only stores so that seems fit for that
> purpose.
>
> Btw,
>
> static int x = 1;
>
> int main()
> {
> x = 1;
> }
>
> should ideally be handled as
>
> fixup_cfg already removes write-only stores so that seems fit for that
> purpose.
>
> Btw,
>
> static int x = 1;
>
> int main()
> {
> x = 1;
> }
>
> should ideally be handled as well as maybe the more common(?)
>
> static int x[128];
>
> int main()
> {
> memset (x, 0, 128*4);
> }
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102982
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to hubicka from comment #4)
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102982
> >
> > Richard Biener changed:
> >
> >What|Removed |Added
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102982
--- Comment #4 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102982
>
> Richard Biener changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102982
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
