[Bug ipa/111613] [12/13/14 Regression] Bit field stores can be incorrectly optimized away when -fstore-merging is in effect

2023-12-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111613 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug ipa/111613] [12/13/14 Regression] Bit field stores can be incorrectly optimized away when -fstore-merging is in effect

2023-11-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111613 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2023-09-27 00:00:00 |2023-11-7 --- Comment #4 from Richard

[Bug ipa/111613] [12/13/14 Regression] Bit field stores can be incorrectly optimized away when -fstore-merging is in effect

2023-10-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111613 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Sean.XiaoXiang at outlook dot com ---

[Bug ipa/111613] [12/13/14 Regression] Bit field stores can be incorrectly optimized away when -fstore-merging is in effect

2023-09-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111613 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- It's the late IPA modref that mis-analyzes the store-merged sequence I think.

[Bug ipa/111613] [12/13/14 Regression] Bit field stores can be incorrectly optimized away when -fstore-merging is in effect

2023-09-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111613 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|