https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
--- Comment #23 from Yvan Roux yroux at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: yroux
Date: Mon Mar 23 09:55:34 2015
New Revision: 221590
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221590root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-03-23 Yvan Roux yvan.r...@linaro.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
--- Comment #21 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Feb 11 13:33:47 2015
New Revision: 220616
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220616root=gccview=rev
Log:
Handle noreturn function thunk creation.
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
--- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Full regtesting just completed. Unless pr64982 and
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00550.html are masking some
latent bug introduced by the patch, it does not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
--- Comment #17 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34702
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34702action=edit
Suggested patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
--- Comment #16 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hello.
Sorry for delay, I was away last week. Following patch should prevent a
creation of return values for cases where the called function is noreturn.
May I ask you for testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
--- Comment #19 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
However I see the following regression (for both -m32 and -m64)
FAIL: 22_locale/conversions/string/2.cc execution test
It is pr64797 and not a regression due to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
--- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
May I ask you for testing on a darwin machine?
I have bootstrapped revision r220534 with the patch. AFAICT the patch fixes the
failures reported in this PR (tested with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
--- Comment #15 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #12)
I'been testing patch that does not create retval and return gimple statement.
Any updates on the testing?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|23_containers/unordered_map |[5
14 matches
Mail list logo
