https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83411
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Jan 7 09:18:46 2020
New Revision: 279948
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279948&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Document cloning for the target_clone attribute.
2020-01-07 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83411
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #5)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> > So finding
> > a point like your 'loop' and using flatten attribute can guarantee the
> > call-chain is fully optimize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83411
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83411
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Thank you Hannes for the report and also the nice blog post.
I must agree that's sort of limitation, but I don't agree that it's limiting
much:
1) Note that dispatch happens just once when an executable is st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83411
--- Comment #3 from Hannes Hauswedell ---
I agree that the problem is related, I don't however think that solving PR82625
will solve the problem, as it would require me to multiversion every function
in my part of the subgraph, or not?
i.e.: giv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83411
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83411
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
