https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93707
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93707
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93707
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cfeef9acd2cec93ed6338cc0d9fad98bdc0f7599
commit r10-6904-gcfeef9acd2cec93ed6338cc0d9fad98bdc0f7599
Author: Martin Jambor
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93707
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
I have proposed a patch on the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-02/msg01321.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93707
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93707
--- Comment #2 from fxue at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For a self-recursive function, a for-all-contexts clone could generate an edge
whose callee is not the function. Thus, to check whether an edge stands for a
recursive call during cloning, we should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93707
--- Comment #1 from fxue at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 47825
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47825=edit
A simplified case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93707
fxue at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
