--- Comment #21 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:47 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks.
--
--- Comment #20 from mckinlay at redhat dot com 2006-06-07 18:06 ---
*** Bug 27925 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
mckinlay at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.3 |4.0.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19870
--- Comment #19 from mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-22 16:45 ---
The testcase in the following message still seems to fail:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2005-12/msg00181.html
Here is a variant of the original example that also fails:
public class A
{
public static class B
{
--
rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|org
--- Comment #17 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-05 19:35
---
Subject: Bug 19870
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-05 19:35:46
Modified files:
gcc/java : ChangeLog
--- Comment #18 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-05 19:40
---
Also fixed in 4.0.3.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-16
18:22 ---
Subject: Bug 19870
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-16 18:22:34
Modified files:
gcc/java : ChangeLog parse.y
Log message:
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-16
18:32 ---
Subject: Bug 19870
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-16 18:32:14
Modified files:
libjava: ChangeLog
--- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-16
18:39 ---
Last part of the fix has now been checked in.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-14
15:50 ---
Updated patch for Part 2 posted in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q3/msg00195.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19
03:23 ---
A patch for the remaining bit is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q2/msg00742.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-26
07:31 ---
I have now submitted a patch for fixing this bug:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q2/msg00570.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-27
05:11 ---
Subject: Bug 19870
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-27 05:11:44
Modified files:
libjava: ChangeLog
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-27
05:15 ---
Subject: Bug 19870
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-27 05:15:30
Modified files:
gcc/java : ChangeLog java-tree.h jcf-write.c
--- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-27
05:39 ---
Note that this PR should not be closed as the checked-in patch was
only for generating accessors for static fields. Methods are still
a problem as is demonstrated by this simple testcase:
public class A
{
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-23
07:45 ---
outer_field_access_p(), build_outer_field_access(), etc. are only for non-static
fields (instance variables). Even for some simple testcases, I could not get GCJ
to emit correct bytecode for non-static
18 matches
Mail list logo
