https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89136
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #5)
> Thanks for finding and reporting this.
You are welcome. I was testing new clang-8.0.0-rc1
and hadn't compiled gcc with clang for a while.
clang warns for "=+"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89136
--- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> Shouldn't we have a warning for this =+ vs. += case (of course, =- is fine)?
I found PR45358 - "Diagnostic could be issued for old C style a =+ b and
similar case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89136
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89136
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89136
--- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Thu Jan 31 12:17:32 2019
New Revision: 268419
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268419&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[libbacktrace] Fix .gnu_debugaltlink build-id check
The 'debugaltlink_name
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89136
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89136
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
