https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106295
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I don't think that is a bad idea. I realize that this comes up often enough to
consider some solution.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106295
--- Comment #6 from ghlixo at gmail dot com ---
One last comment about this issue.
I maintain and distribute a Fortran subroutine package to users. In my
experience, most of them are unaware that Fortran compilers evolve over time,
and that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106295
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106295
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think the fix for PR83036 (INQUIRE specifier NEXTREC is a 4-byte integer,
should be 8), which changed the layout of struct st_parameter_inquire,
could explain what you observe.
I have no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106295
--- Comment #3 from ghlixo at gmail dot com ---
That first attachment contains both parts of the code (main, subroutine). The
later ones are the individual pieces.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106295
--- Comment #2 from ghlixo at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 53298
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53298=edit
subroutine (to be compiled with older libfortran)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106295
--- Comment #1 from ghlixo at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 53297
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53297=edit
main program (to be compiled with latest release, e.g. 11.2.0)
