[Bug libfortran/16135] [4.0 Regression] libfortran doesn't build, use of C99 types

2004-12-04 Thread evandro at yahoo dot com
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2004-12-04 18:06 --- Never mind, it was a dud. My bad... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16135

[Bug libfortran/16135] [4.0 Regression] libfortran doesn't build, use of C99 types

2004-12-03 Thread evandro at yahoo dot com
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2004-12-03 23:15 --- It now causes building natively on AMD64 to fail... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16135

[Bug libfortran/16135] [4.0 Regression] libfortran doesn't build, use of C99 types

2004-12-03 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-03 23:34 --- It now causes building natively on AMD64 to fail... The patch? If so, this would seem surprising: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-12/msg00028.html --

[Bug libfortran/16135] [4.0 Regression] libfortran doesn't build, use of C99 types

2004-12-03 Thread evandro at yahoo dot com
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2004-12-04 00:09 --- The patch? If so, this would seem surprising: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-12/msg00028.html It fails building libgfortran as of make install. Could it be that there's a valid libgfortran on the

[Bug libfortran/16135] [4.0 Regression] libfortran doesn't build, use of C99 types

2004-12-03 Thread evandro at yahoo dot com
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2004-12-04 00:13 --- (In reply to comment #14) The patch? If so, this would seem surprising: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-12/msg00028.html It fails building libgfortran as of make install. Could it be that

[Bug libfortran/16135] [4.0 Regression] libfortran doesn't build, use of C99 types

2004-12-03 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-04 00:22 --- It fails building libgfortran as of make install. Could it be that there's a valid libgfortran on the system? Sorry, I don't understand: does your problem have anything to do with this bug? If no,

[Bug libfortran/16135] [4.0 Regression] libfortran doesn't build, use of C99 types

2004-11-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-20 13:15 --- Subject: Bug 16135 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-20 13:15:17 Modified files: libgfortran: ChangeLog acinclude.m4 config.h.in

[Bug libfortran/16135] [4.0 Regression] libfortran doesn't build, use of C99 types

2004-11-20 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-20 13:21 --- See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2004-11/msg00127.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/16135] [4.0 Regression] libfortran doesn't build, use of C99 types

2004-11-20 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 16135 depends on bug 17999, which changed state. Bug 17999 Summary: [4.0 Regression] libfortran: uses some C99 functions (snprintf) http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17999 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug libfortran/16135] [4.0 Regression] libfortran doesn't build, use of C99 types

2004-11-15 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-15 12:04 --- This is a regression wrt to the Fortran 77 compiler. -- What|Removed |Added