--- Additional Comments From bdavis9659 at comcast dot net 2005-05-31
02:36 ---
proposed patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-05/msg00431.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21621
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-31
02:45 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19303 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi 2005-05-24
20:02 ---
Well no, the standard does not specify how unformatted sequential record markers
are implemented. In short, gfortran uses markers of type off_t, which is 64 bits
on operating systems with large file (LFS)
--- Additional Comments From P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot
de 2005-05-23 09:05 ---
Hi!
I was trying to read some binary data written by a GFortran binary with binaries
written with other compilers (LF, SGI), and I couldn't get anywhere, so I just
started to poke around
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-19 16:43
---
Can you be a little more specific on what you're trying to do and why you think
that what gfortran does is wrong?
I don't think the standard requires sequential access files to be in any
reliable format. I
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-19 16:44
---
Um, I meant to set this to waiting ...
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--
What|Removed |Added
GCC build triplet|GCC 4.1.0 20050517 |
GCC host triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu |
GCC target triplet|
