[Bug libfortran/24459] gfortran namelist problem

2006-05-20 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-20 07:15 --- Subject: Bug 24459 Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat May 20 07:14:50 2006 New Revision: 113924 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113924 Log: 2006-05-20 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug libfortran/24459] gfortran namelist problem

2006-05-15 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #15 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:30 --- Subject: Bug number PR24459 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg0.html --

[Bug libfortran/24459] gfortran namelist problem

2006-05-02 Thread ed at eh3 dot com
--- Comment #14 from ed at eh3 dot com 2006-05-02 16:20 --- Hi Jerry, I just re-ran the test case in this bug report and some other examples from our oceanic/atmospheric model (mitgcm.org) using gfortran which was checked out at about 12:30am (May 2) with: svn -q checkout

[Bug libfortran/24459] gfortran namelist problem

2006-05-01 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-02 00:02 --- Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-05/msg0.html Waiting for approval -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24459

[Bug libfortran/24459] gfortran namelist problem

2006-04-22 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org

[Bug libfortran/24459] gfortran namelist problem

2005-12-04 Thread ed at eh3 dot com
--- Comment #11 from ed at eh3 dot com 2005-12-04 19:54 --- Thank you for re-opening this bug! In an attempt to make our model (http://mitgcm.org) as portable as possible, we tried switching the namelist syntax from the older Fortran77 to F90 triplets and discovered the following:

[Bug libfortran/24459] gfortran namelist problem

2005-12-04 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-04 23:11 --- We just had a discussion regarding another similar problem. The maintainers need to come to some concensus on the behavior of some compiler flags such as -std=f95 and -pedantic. Once that is settled then we

[Bug libfortran/24459] gfortran namelist problem

2005-11-25 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-25 19:44 --- I am reopening this PR because I recieved information that the behavior is a pre F90 feature commonly used before array triplet notation was introduced. I also found that it is supported in g77. So we

[Bug libfortran/24459] gfortran namelist problem

2005-11-24 Thread ed at eh3 dot com
--- Comment #8 from ed at eh3 dot com 2005-11-24 16:26 --- Hi Jerry, thank you for looking into this issue and clarifing it! The use of correct array triplets is a very quick and easy thing for us to do. And its certainly a good idea to follow the Fortran standard. --

[Bug libfortran/24459] gfortran namelist problem

2005-11-24 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-24 17:25 --- After going to comp.lang.fortran I determined this is not a bug and gfortran is correctly handling the given namelist. To get desired behavior use array qualifiers with array triplet notation. -- jvdelisle

[Bug libfortran/24459] gfortran namelist problem

2005-11-23 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-24 07:21 --- This is not a bug. Gfortran is complying with F95 namelist read requirements. This would be an enhancement or extension. The work around is to use correct array triplets in the array qualifiers for namelist

[Bug libfortran/24459] gfortran namelist problem

2005-11-02 Thread ed at eh3 dot com
--- Comment #6 from ed at eh3 dot com 2005-11-02 13:12 --- Hi jvdelisle, I'm not sure if it qualifies as high priority but it is one of the few (only?) gfortran bugs that we've encountered with the MITgcm fluid flow and transport model (http://mitgcm.org). If it helps, I'll be happy

[Bug libfortran/24459] gfortran namelist problem

2005-11-01 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-02 06:41 --- I will be looking at this sometime soon. If this is high priority I will shift from DATE and TIME intrinsics to this. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24459

[Bug libfortran/24459] gfortran namelist problem

2005-10-29 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-30 02:59 --- OK I have a patch for the segfault I was seeing and now I see the error the OP discusses. I will continue on that as soon as I get the other bug fix submitted for review. (I will have to create a new PR for the

[Bug libfortran/24459] gfortran namelist problem

2005-10-25 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-26 02:44 --- With the first case given, I get a segfault on i686-pc-linux-gnu. gcc version 4.1.0 20051025 (experimental) $ cat diag.nml DIAGS NAMES = 'ETAN' 'ETANSQ' 'DETADT2' 'PHIBOT' 'PHIBOTSQ' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' ''

[Bug libfortran/24459] gfortran namelist problem

2005-10-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 22:27 --- Confirmed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|