--- Comment #36 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 17:50 ---
I'll revert the patch that changes the XFAIL. I noticed yesterday that the
test was failing on powerpc64-linux on a distribution that I hadn't tested on
before, although the new XFAIL had worked on the other
--- Comment #37 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 18:14 ---
Subject: Bug 24685
Author: janis
Date: Fri Dec 19 18:12:40 2008
New Revision: 142840
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142840
Log:
Revert:
2008-12-12 Janis Johnson
--- Comment #38 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 18:22 ---
Subject: Bug 24685
Author: janis
Date: Fri Dec 19 18:20:41 2008
New Revision: 142841
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142841
Log:
Revert:
2008-12-12 Janis Johnson
--- Comment #35 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-12-19
01:38 ---
Revision 142724 causes...
FAIL: gfortran.dg/default_format_denormal_2.f90 -O0 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/default_format_denormal_2.f90 -O1 execution test
FAIL:
--- Comment #33 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-12 22:18 ---
Subject: Bug 24685
Author: janis
Date: Fri Dec 12 22:17:31 2008
New Revision: 142724
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142724
Log:
PR libgfortran/24685
*
--- Comment #34 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-12 22:22 ---
Subject: Bug 24685
Author: janis
Date: Fri Dec 12 22:21:14 2008
New Revision: 142725
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142725
Log:
PR libgfortran/24685
*
--- Comment #32 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-28 07:09 ---
Subject: Bug 24685
Author: uros
Date: Thu Feb 28 07:08:51 2008
New Revision: 132737
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=132737
Log:
PR target/25477
* gcc/config/darwin-protos.h: Add
--- Comment #30 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-23 20:10
---
On powerpc-apple-darwin9.2, gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90 fails for
that reason:
$ cat a.f90
real(kind=16) :: a,b
character(len=180) :: tmp
b =
--- Comment #31 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-23 20:11
---
Subject: Bug 24685
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sat Feb 23 20:10:29 2008
New Revision: 132577
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=132577
Log:
PR libfortran/24685
*
--- Comment #29 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-01-25 15:40 ---
see also pr32841.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24685
--- Comment #28 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-01-24 14:01 ---
Some remarks from powerpc-apple-darwin9:
(1) the title is misleading: formatted inputs are not broken, formatted outputs
are.
(2) they seem broken for constants nearest from bellow any power of two, as
shown by
--- Comment #26 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-17 10:49 ---
Add gfortran.dg/default_format_2.f90 to the summary as that test case points
here.
It seems to fail also for s390-ibm-linux-gnu (for test (1.0_kl, 0)) and for
sparc-unknown-linux-gnu (these are not yet XFAILED).
--- Comment #27 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-17 13:11
---
Add gfortran.dg/default_format_2.f90 to the summary as that test case points
here.
But this is confusing, as demonstrated by...
It seems to fail also for s390-ibm-linux-gnu (for test (1.0_kl, 0))
and for
--- Comment #25 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-12 05:44
---
This is now:
[Bug libc/5268] huge and denornal reads and writes for long doubles
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5268
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24685
--- Comment #24 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-03 16:48
---
Subject: Bug 24685
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Nov 3 16:47:37 2007
New Revision: 129871
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=129871
Log:
2007-11-03 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #23 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-05-26 17:51 ---
Is this still broken or can we close?
As far as I can tell it is still broken
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-05/msg00628.html).
I would like to fix this if possible.
Me too!-)
If Jack Howarth send me a
--- Comment #22 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-25 19:50
---
Is this still broken or can we close? I would like to fix this if possible.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24685
--- Comment #19 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 18:58
---
(In reply to comment #18)
it is still broken on powerpc{,64}
Hi Jakub, I'm not sure exactly what is still broken. On
powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0, with mainline gfortran 20060512:
$ cat foo.f90
! { dg-do run }
--- Comment #19 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 18:58
---
(In reply to comment #18)
it is still broken on powerpc{,64}
Hi Jakub, I'm not sure exactly what is still broken. On
powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0, with mainline gfortran 20060512:
Darwin is broken a
--- Comment #20 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2006-05-24 19:01
---
Subject: Re: real(16) formatted input is broken for huge values
--- Comment #19 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 18:58
---
(In reply to comment #18)
it is still broken on
--- Comment #21 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 20:34
---
(In reply to comment #20)
Darwin is broken a different way and it is a mess that I was trying to fix but
it is still broken because I don't care that much anymore.
Could you give a Fortran testcase that is
--- Comment #17 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-21 17:04 ---
Subject: Bug 24685
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Apr 21 17:04:04 2006
New Revision: 113137
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113137
Log:
PR libgfortran/24685
* io/write.c
--- Comment #18 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-21 17:22 ---
While this should now be fixed on s390{,x} (and I believe also sparc*)
with -mlong-double-128, it is still broken on powerpc{,64}.
What happens there is that gfortran returns a non-canonical number
for huge (0.0_16)
--- Comment #16 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-10 12:02 ---
Subject: Bug 24685
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Apr 10 12:02:55 2006
New Revision: 112819
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112819
Log:
PR libgfortran/24685
* io/write.c
--- Comment #14 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-01 21:34
---
Subject: Bug 24685
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sat Apr 1 21:34:27 2006
New Revision: 112611
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112611
Log:
PR libfortran/24685
*
--- Comment #15 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-01 21:35
---
Subject: Bug 24685
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sat Apr 1 21:35:34 2006
New Revision: 112612
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112612
Log:
PR libfortran/24685
*
--- Comment #13 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-16 08:30 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
The attached C program fails on IA64 because the printf rounds the last digit
of MIN_LDBL down when it prints it and so it can't be read back in. The basic
problem is that LDBL_MAX and
--- Comment #11 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 16:22 ---
Tentative patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg00950.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24685
--- Comment #12 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-03-15 16:44 ---
At least on IA64, I don't think there is a way to make this test work. I tried
a change similar to yours. I also changed the setting of ndigits (uses the
magic number 27 in a couple of places), changed the number 31
--- Comment #10 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 07:29
---
Please XFAIL the testcase on the relevant platforms.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24685
--- Comment #9 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-02-23 17:44 ---
I am still seeing this fail on ia64-hp-hpux11.23 which uses real*16. I believe
the problem is in io/write.c (output_float). While write_real sets the maximum
width to 40 for real*16, output_float still uses a 32 char
--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-16 11:12
---
OK, I think this is the same bug as reported on some ppc64-linux non-standard
builds. It has to deal with real(16), and is indeed the very same kind of
problem.
This is not a bug introduced by the patch, it just
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-16 17:44 ---
powerpc-darwin has the failure and it supports 128bit long double by default.
powerpc64-linux does not which is why I am removing it from the target.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
33 matches
Mail list logo
