--- Comment #14 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 12:54 ---
Subject: Bug 29649
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Jan 18 12:54:11 2007
New Revision: 120897
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120897
Log:
2007-01-18 Francois-Xavier Coudert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #15 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 12:56 ---
Fixed in the trunk.
Creating a backtrace is now PR 30498.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #12 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-05 14:03
---
(In reply to comment #11)
A draft patch was posted (quite a while ago) by FX:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-11/msg00634.html
I'd add that it's easy to separate the coredump part of the patch (handling of
--- Comment #13 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-01-05 21:25 ---
Subject: Bug number PR29649
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00431.html
--
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|org
--- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-02 15:10 ---
(Just to make sure it is not forgotten:)
A draft patch was posted (quite a while ago) by FX:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-11/msg00634.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29649
--- Comment #10 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-19 14:58
---
Working on this
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-02 23:42 ---
PR 5773 is about addr2line in gcj.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-02 23:52
---
We can fork+exec addr2line, but we can't link libbfd because it's GPL.
It was mentionned on IRC tonight that Daniel Berlin has a library that extracts
line and file information from DWARF2 info. It's internal to
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-31 16:01
---
(In reply to comment #3)
coredumping is easy, simply call abort() or kill(0,SIGSEGV)
The usual signal to request a core dump is SIGQUIT.
However, I'm more a fan of either coredumping
Same opinion here.
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-31 15:54 ---
Nice idea.
coredumping is easy, simply call abort() or kill(0,SIGSEGV)
and make sure that ulimit -c (csh: limit core) shows a big enough number.
This is actually what NAG f95 does and has the advantage that one can
--- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-31 16:02
---
Created an attachment (id=12519)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12519action=view)
Example of how to use unwind for backtrace purposes
The patch I was quoting in my previous comment; here, it
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-31 18:37 ---
Using unwind is the way to go for a more serious solution.
Looks nice as a starting point. (My biggest problem with developing this would
be to find out whether it works on strange machines like Sparc, Windows etc.)
- Support for coredumps (compile time? Environment variable? The latter
overwriting the former?)
[Advantage compile-time option: The core is there, if one needs it. Advantage
run-time option: One can quickly turn it on, if needed.]
- Traceback support more or less as outlined above (comment
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2006-10-31 19:10
---
Subject: Re: Force core dump on runtime library errors
- Support for coredumps (compile time? Environment variable? The latter
overwriting the former?)
[Advantage compile-time option: The core is there, if
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-30 12:24
---
I think it's better to file it with the library.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de
2006-10-30 12:29 ---
I think a '-traceback' would be a very nice enhancement! (as you could then
have the likes of 'ERRTRA' from Lahey or 'TRACEBACKQQ' from Compaq, I forgot
how it translates with Intel...)
--
P
18 matches
Mail list logo
