--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31052
--- Comment #51 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-20 23:50
---
Two testcases for 4.3 pass on 4.2. Fixed on 4.3. Because of the problems with
regressions on SPEC, I would rather not backport this. Closing.
Herald, if something else comes up, please file a new report.
--- Comment #51 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-28 05:14 ---
Subject: Bug 31052
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Apr 28 05:11:29 2007
New Revision: 124256
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=124256
Log:
Merged revisions 123029-123122 via svnmerge from
--- Comment #48 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 20:19
---
Created an attachment (id=13365)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13365action=view)
A possible fix for sixtrack, again and again
hjl,
Would you please try this patch and see if it
--- Comment #49 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-04-14 22:09 ---
(In reply to comment #48)
Created an attachment (id=13365)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13365action=view) [edit]
A possible fix for sixtrack, again and again
hjl,
Would you please try this
--- Comment #50 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 02:55
---
Patch committed to trunk.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31052
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #45 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-13 05:32
---
(In reply to comment #44)
sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2K started to fail on Mar. 19:
And then start passing and then again started to fail again on/around April
1st. HJL when will
--- Comment #46 from jvdelisle at verizon dot net 2007-04-13 08:05 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 only] Bad IOSTAT values when readings
NAMELISTs past EOF
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #45 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-13 05:32
---
(In reply to
--- Comment #47 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-04-13 17:16 ---
(In reply to comment #46)
Subject: Re: [4.2 only] Bad IOSTAT values when readings
NAMELISTs past EOF
Now I am confused because I reverted and re-patched and it was tested by
spark
and sixtrack was then fine. I
--- Comment #44 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-04-13 05:28 ---
sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2K started to fail on Mar. 19:
http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/spec2000.em64t/gcc/log/20070319/CFP2000.002.html
and it still fails today. Is it caused by this bug fix?
--
hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #45 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-13 05:32
---
(In reply to comment #44)
sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2K started to fail on Mar. 19:
And then start passing and then again started to fail again on/around April
1st. HJL when will you please get your dates correct.
--- Comment #43 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2007-04-10 21:40 ---
(In reply to comment #42)
In my attempts at narrowing down I found a (minor) problem
with INQUIRE, see PR 31532. Will continue on this one.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31052
--- Comment #41 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2007-04-02 08:42 ---
(In reply to comment #40)
New Revision: 123404
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123404
Log:
2007-04-01 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jerry,
thanks so far, but now I am back to the situation
--- Comment #42 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-02 14:35
---
Will keep open until we get them all!. Looks like I need another test case. :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31052
14 matches
Mail list logo
