--- Comment #37 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-15 00:50
---
Fixed on 4.5.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #35 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-23 00:59
---
Subject: Bug 32784
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jul 23 00:58:46 2009
New Revision: 149970
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=149970
Log:
2009-07-22 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #34 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-19 13:43
---
Cygwin only patch submitted. MingW next.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32784
--- Comment #33 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-14 00:59
---
Patch tested on Cygwin and submitted for approval. Need a tester for mingw.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32784
--- Comment #32 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-04 12:54 ---
Jerry, was the patch submitted already?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32784
--- Comment #31 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-11 16:45
---
now that 4.5 branch is alive I will try once again to submit patch for
approval.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32784
--- Comment #30 from steve dot chapel at a2pg dot com 2008-11-18 12:59
---
Although bug 38122 causes NONMEM to not run as is, all it takes is a simple
one-line change to get it to run normally on Linux.
This bug, on the other hand, makes it effectively impossible to run NONMEM
--- Comment #28 from steve dot chapel at a2pg dot com 2008-11-17 15:01
---
I'm changing the summary of this bug report to better indicate the problem that
the patch fixes.
Could we get the patch into gfortran 4.5? There is discussion on the NONMEM
users mailing list about how to get
--- Comment #29 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-18 03:02
---
Steve, I will try but we also still have the issue of 38122 as well.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32784
