[Bug libfortran/33225] Missing last digit in some formatted output (on 32bit targets), per kind write_float

2007-09-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #21 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-09-05 09:19 --- Subject: Re: Missing last digit in some formatted output (on 32bit targets), per kind write_float If I am not mistaken, the test case did not go through. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33225

[Bug libfortran/33225] Missing last digit in some formatted output (on 32bit targets), per kind write_float

2007-09-05 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #22 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-06 01:32 --- Subject: Bug 33225 Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Sep 6 01:32:11 2007 New Revision: 128173 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=128173 Log: 2007-09-06 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug libfortran/33225] Missing last digit in some formatted output (on 32bit targets), per kind write_float

2007-09-04 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #19 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 10:22 --- This one can be considered FIXED, I think. -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/33225] Missing last digit in some formatted output (on 32bit targets), per kind write_float

2007-09-04 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #20 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-05 00:51 --- Subject: Bug 33225 Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Sep 5 00:51:18 2007 New Revision: 128114 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=128114 Log: 2007-03-04 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug libfortran/33225] Missing last digit in some formatted output (on 32bit targets), per kind write_float

2007-09-03 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 04:49 --- Changed title to reflect what this is, not really a regression at this point. -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/33225] Missing last digit in some formatted output (on 32bit targets), per kind write_float

2007-09-03 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #14 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-09-04 04:58 --- Did you also have a look to the other problem: print *, nearest(huge(1.0),1.0), nearest(-huge(1.0),-1.0), nearest(huge(1.0d0) 1 Error: Result of NEAREST overflows its kind at (1) ? --

[Bug libfortran/33225] Missing last digit in some formatted output (on 32bit targets), per kind write_float

2007-09-03 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 05:39 --- Yes, I also checked the huge testcase and its all clean now. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33225

[Bug libfortran/33225] Missing last digit in some formatted output (on 32bit targets), per kind write_float

2007-09-03 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #16 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-09-04 05:40 --- Subject: Bug number PR33225 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-09/msg00176.html --

[Bug libfortran/33225] Missing last digit in some formatted output (on 32bit targets), per kind write_float

2007-09-03 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 05:44 --- Dominique: The problem in comment 14 is not fixed and I do not think its related. I will check further though. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33225

[Bug libfortran/33225] Missing last digit in some formatted output (on 32bit targets), per kind write_float

2007-09-03 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #18 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-09-04 05:47 --- I do not think its related. I just realized that and I filled PR33296. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33225