--- Comment #9 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 20:13 ---
Subject: Bug 33683
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Oct 9 20:13:18 2007
New Revision: 129174
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129174
Log:
2007-10-09 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR li
--- Comment #8 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-07 21:45 ---
Fixed.
Let's close this and watch for occurences of
gamma_5.f90 failing, then open a new bug report
if that happens.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |A
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-07 21:36 ---
Subject: Bug 33683
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Oct 7 21:36:09 2007
New Revision: 129116
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129116
Log:
2007-10-07 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR li
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-07 18:43
---
I have tested this on x86-64-linux. It works here as well. After reading the
man page myself, I think this is the answer and I would commit it as obvious.
The only question is what do other platforms do? AIX hp
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-07 16:48 ---
This fixes things at least on my system; this also
passes regression-testing.
Index: mathbuiltins.def
===
--- mathbuiltins.def(revision 129050)
+++
--- Comment #4 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-07 12:01 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I think we need to use tgamma() where available. If it isn't, we
> need a test to check whether gamma() is equivalent to tgamma() or
> to lgamma().
>
> Yuck.
It may be simpler to calculate
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-07 10:22 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I checked and the simplification routines work correctly, which means there is
> no real testsuite coverage for these functions. We should always include
> testcases comparing values calcul
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-06 23:04
---
I checked and the simplification routines work correctly, which means there is
no real testsuite coverage for these functions. We should always include
testcases comparing values calculated at runtime with constan
--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-10-06 22:28 ---
On Darwin I get:
/usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols:
_gammaf
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Target: powerpc-apple-darwin8
Configured with: ../gcc-4.3-work/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc/gcc4.3w
--mandir=/opt/gcc/gcc4.
