[Bug libfortran/38199] missed optimization: I/O performance

2013-02-15 Thread manfred99 at gmx dot ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199 --- Comment #22 from Manfred Schwarb manfred99 at gmx dot ch 2013-02-15 10:20:46 UTC --- Last month I had a private communication with Jerry, whether this bug can be closed. I decided to add a summary to the bugzilla page: The fix of

[Bug libfortran/38199] missed optimization: I/O performance

2012-04-18 Thread manfred99 at gmx dot ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199 --- Comment #21 from Manfred Schwarb manfred99 at gmx dot ch 2012-04-18 09:01:46 UTC --- This new version does fix it, timings are around 0.2s for the above test-case (exactly as fast as the user-optimized len_trim variant). Thanks a lot!

[Bug libfortran/38199] missed optimization: I/O performance

2012-04-17 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199 --- Comment #20 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-17 19:30:39 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Tue Apr 17 19:30:29 2012 New Revision: 186548 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186548 Log: 2012-04-17 Tobias Burnus

[Bug libfortran/38199] missed optimization: I/O performance

2012-04-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199 --- Comment #17 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-15 11:52:49 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Apr 15 11:52:44 2012 New Revision: 186466 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186466 Log: 2012-04-15 Thomas

[Bug libfortran/38199] missed optimization: I/O performance

2012-04-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199 --- Comment #18 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-15 11:55:25 UTC --- Test case from comment #16 has been fixed. Is there anything else to do?

[Bug libfortran/38199] missed optimization: I/O performance

2012-04-15 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199 --- Comment #19 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-15 14:17:43 UTC --- I think this can be closed. Thanks Thomas! The last patch is simple enough to consider a backport.

[Bug libfortran/38199] missed optimization: I/O performance

2012-03-19 Thread manfred99 at gmx dot ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199 --- Comment #16 from Manfred Schwarb manfred99 at gmx dot ch 2012-03-19 09:42:29 UTC --- Thanks, Janne, for your patch. It does not help very much, though. [ As expected, as the reading part is the bottleneck ] My current timings of the second

[Bug libfortran/38199] missed optimization: I/O performance

2012-03-15 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199 --- Comment #15 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-15 15:14:51 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Thu Mar 15 15:14:43 2012 New Revision: 185433 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185433 Log: 2012-03-15 Janne Blomqvist