https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
Bug 48852 depends on bug 48925, which changed state.
Bug 48925 Summary: Code cleanup in write_float.def
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48925
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
--- Comment #17 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jun 23 15:58:05 2016
New Revision: 237735
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237735&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-23 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran/48852
* i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
--- Comment #16 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Patch posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-06/msg00047.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||48925
--- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I have decided that to do this right I need to revamp how write_float.def and
associated functions are organized. We have discussed doing this quite a while
ago, so now is the time.
I see it like this:
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
--- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Thomas Henlich from comment #12)
--- snip ---
> There is also case C (right-flush in 2*w+3):
--- snip ---
Oh yes, Thanks Thomas. I now see you mentioned this in your previous comment.
It wil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Henlich ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #10)
> gfortran currently does this with default formatting, list directed outout:
> -
> ( 1., 0.) ( -1.00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle ---
IFORT does this:
-
(1.00,0.000E+00) (-1.000E-25,0.000E+00)
(-1.000E-25,0.000E+00) (1.00,0.000E+00)
(-3.499E-24,-3.499E-24) (-4.200
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle ---
gfortran currently does this with default formatting, list directed outout:
-
( 1., 0.) ( -1.0002E-25, 0.)
( -1.0002E-25, 0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Henlich
2011-05-05 13:31:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Also, See below. Does this give the expected output?
>
> print *, (1.0, 0.0)
> end
>
> $ ./a.out
> (1.,.)
I personally prefer the opti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
--- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-05-05 12:44:42
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> On 05/05/2011 12:04 AM, thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net wrote:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
> ---snip---
> > As much as I'd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at frontier dot com 2011-05-05 12:28:01 UTC ---
On 05/05/2011 12:04 AM, thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
---snip---
> As much as I'd like to, I cannot agr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
--- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-05-05 12:11:02
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > neither 0PFw.d nor 1PEw.dEe allow it). However, AFAICS leading blanks are
> > still
> > allowed as they are part of the real
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Henlich
2011-05-05 06:50:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> neither 0PFw.d nor 1PEw.dEe allow it). However, AFAICS leading blanks are
> still
> allowed as they are part of the real parts, the prohibition against emb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
--- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-05-05 03:33:30
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> We have another PR in place that is related to this, pr31190
Thanks for the reminder.
> One thought was to hide this behind an option so that one could s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
19 matches
Mail list logo
