https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52879
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I think the current implementation has a decent protection against bad seeds,
> so lets close this as fixed.
The least I can say is that I am not convinced about the "decent protection".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52879
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52879
--- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist ---
To be honest, I'm not sure that this test program really tests anything
sensible. There is no rule in the secret black book of PRNG algorithm design,
nor in the Fortran standard, that generating a single
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52879
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52879
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52879
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Potential patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-02/msg00047.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52879
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
