[Bug libfortran/85906] Conditional jump depends on uninitialized value in write_decimal / write_integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85906 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/85906] Conditional jump depends on uninitialized value in write_decimal / write_integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85906 --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Jan Niklas Hasse from comment #8) > Thanks! If I understand it correctly this will go into 8.1.2? Per usual sequence, the next release of the 8 branch will be 8.2. However, some linux

[Bug libfortran/85906] Conditional jump depends on uninitialized value in write_decimal / write_integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85906 --- Comment #8 from Jan Niklas Hasse --- Thanks! If I understand it correctly this will go into 8.1.2?

[Bug libfortran/85906] Conditional jump depends on uninitialized value in write_decimal / write_integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85906 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun May 27 03:22:11 2018 New Revision: 260802 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260802=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-26 Jerry DeLisle Backport from

[Bug libfortran/85906] Conditional jump depends on uninitialized value in write_decimal / write_integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85906 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- Fixed on trunk. If anyone thinks this should be backported as a regression, let me know.

[Bug libfortran/85906] Conditional jump depends on uninitialized value in write_decimal / write_integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85906 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle --- 2018-05-26 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortran/85906 * io/write.c (write_integer): Initialise the fnode format to FMT_NONE, used for list directed write.

[Bug libfortran/85906] Conditional jump depends on uninitialized value in write_decimal / write_integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85906 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- After checking for possible other execution paths, it looks like the proposed patch will work fine. It is more obvious then that, the fnode is a local declaration. I will commit this one as "obvious" after

[Bug libfortran/85906] Conditional jump depends on uninitialized value in write_decimal / write_integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85906 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/85906] Conditional jump depends on uninitialized value in write_decimal / write_integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85906 --- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to kargl from comment #1) > I've added Jerry to the CC as he's probably the most familiar with > this area of the library. Jerry, does this one-line patch look > correct or are there deeper issues

[Bug libfortran/85906] Conditional jump depends on uninitialized value in write_decimal / write_integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85906 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|