https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92100
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92100
--- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Nov 27 00:50:51 2019
New Revision: 278753
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278753=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-11-26 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from mainline
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92100
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Nov 26 22:56:24 2019
New Revision: 278740
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278740=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-11-26 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from mainline
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92100
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle ---
> Modified:
> trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
Hi hit the wrong log file for the testsuite entry. It has been fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92100
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Nov 25 02:24:55 2019
New Revision: 278664
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278664=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-11-24 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/92100
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92100
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Nov 24 22:14:59 2019
New Revision: 278660
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278660=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-11-24 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/92100
io/transfer.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92100
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92100
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92100
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 10:57:05PM +, angus at agibson dot me wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92100
>
> --- Comment #5 from Angus Gibson ---
> I agree that it's not ideal...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92100
--- Comment #5 from Angus Gibson ---
I agree that it's not ideal... Unfortunately an awkward file format, and
fortran is usually the wrong language for this kind of IO anyway. I guess the
note that "A processor may prohibit some control
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92100
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Here's a self-contained program. AFAICT, pos= has an effect only within the
first record, and thereafter it is ignored.
F2018, 12.3.3.4(4) gives a bulleted list of things that can cause problems
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92100
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 47050
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47050=edit
self-contained program
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92100
--- Comment #2 from Angus Gibson ---
Created attachment 47037
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47037=edit
Reproducing example (gz)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92100
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
14 matches
Mail list logo
