https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.2.1
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731
--- Comment #21 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Thomas Neumann
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:11f37868bb5812c4f0ac023909f5421595f68a43
commit r13-8555-g11f37868bb5812c4f0ac023909f5421595f68a43
Author: Thomas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Neumann :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a364148530c28645ce87adbc58a66c9f32a325ab
commit r14-9620-ga364148530c28645ce87adbc58a66c9f32a325ab
Author: Thomas Neumann
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731
--- Comment #19 from Dimitar Yordanov ---
I've rerun related tests and they look OK with the latest patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731
Thomas Neumann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #57679|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731
--- Comment #17 from Dimitar Yordanov ---
I've executed more tests and see another one failing. This time "begin" is
inside of another range, not the one that gets calculated with this "begin". So
there is again an overlapping in the btree.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731
Thomas Neumann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #57675|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731
Thomas Neumann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #57669|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731
--- Comment #12 from Dimitar Yordanov ---
> Does this patch fix the problem for you?
yes. The failing testcase is successful after the change. I'll schedule more
tests.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Neumann ---
Created attachment 57669
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57669=edit
patch to handle overlapping ranges
Does this patch fix the problem for you? I think it should, but I would really
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731
--- Comment #10 from Dimitar Yordanov ---
Valid question. Seeing others hitting the same issue and looking at the
backtrace I would think it is not directly in our code but comes with the usage
LLVMs LLJIT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Neumann ---
I will check how we can handle such a situation. But how did this happen to
begin with? Is this regular code or did you do anything special? I am puzzled
how the unwinding table can be placed like that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731
--- Comment #8 from Dimitar Yordanov ---
yes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Neumann ---
Is it correct that in your case range[0]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731
--- Comment #6 from Dimitar Yordanov ---
Before the fix for PR 110956 there was just one btree_insert call for the same
"ob"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731
--- Comment #5 from Dimitar Yordanov ---
> It looks like the code does not find an unwind frame when de-registering an
> exception handler
>From what I understand so far the issue is already there when doing the
registration. There is twice a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Neumann ---
It looks like the code does not find an unwind frame when de-registering an
exception handler. Are you sure that you do not de-register a dynamic frame
twice?
Otherwise I would need a way to reproduce the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731
Dimitar Yordanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimitar.yordanov at sap dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
The original project is too complex for me to come up with a reproduction case,
I can help with gdb if additional information is needed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111731
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu ---
GCC11.3 is ok, GCC13.2 and later have the issue, I didn't verify GCC12.
23 matches
Mail list logo