--- Comment #9 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-06 20:46
---
Subject: Bug 30071
Author: andreast
Date: Wed Feb 6 20:45:21 2008
New Revision: 132159
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=132159
Log:
2008-02-06 Andreas Tobler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #10 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-06 20:46
---
Committed after ok from Tom T. and a verification install from Dave A.
Thanks.
--
andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-03 20:54
---
Created an attachment (id=15089)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15089action=view)
New trial for the patch in #6, cosmetics only.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30071
--- Comment #8 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-03 20:56
---
Ughh, I completely forgot about this PR. But I remember having had some issues
with the generated Makefile.in. It had some more places which were modified
than I expected. So I may actively forgot about this
--- Comment #6 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-29 21:24
---
install-binPROGRAMS: install-toolexeclibLTLIBRARIES 'overwrites' the
install-binPROGRAMS generated by automake. So this is a no go.
I helped myself with this one:
Index: Makefile.am
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-27 20:11 ---
I don't think we should use this particular patch. My reason is that
ordering alone is insufficient to guarantee success here, if the user
uses make -j.
Instead, explicit dependencies should be used. In addition
--- Comment #4 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2007-04-17
07:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=13377)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13377action=view)
Patch
Proposed patch. I added a new target (install-exec-am) to Makefile.am to
enforce the right
--- Comment #3 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2007-02-19
16:16 ---
Could you try adding this to Makefile.am and then re-running automake?
(If you can't re-run automake, let me know and I will send you a patch.)
install-binPROGRAMS: install-toolexeclibLTLIBRARIES
I
--- Comment #2 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2007-01-30
08:55 ---
Subject: Re: make install fails for libjava
Could you try adding this to Makefile.am and then re-running automake?
(If you can't re-run automake, let me know and I will send you a patch.)
Sorry, I
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-29 20:00 ---
We can't modify the Makefile.in, since those changes will be lost
the next time someone runs automake.
Could you try adding this to Makefile.am and then re-running automake?
(If you can't re-run automake, let me
10 matches
Mail list logo
