[Bug libgcj/31700] [JNI] -X options not recognised by JNI_CreateJavaVM

2008-01-23 Thread debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
--- Comment #4 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2008-01-23 11:07 --- this patch is applied on the current trunk; the bug should be closed. Matthias -- debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/31700] [JNI] -X options not recognised by JNI_CreateJavaVM

2008-01-23 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-23 17:59 --- Fix checked in a while ago. -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/31700] [JNI] -X options not recognised by JNI_CreateJavaVM

2007-05-14 Thread marcus at better dot se
--- Comment #3 from marcus at better dot se 2007-05-14 15:24 --- Subject: Re: [JNI] -X options not recognised by JNI_CreateJavaVM Could you try this patch? I'm trying, but my brand new Thinkpad insists on rebooting every time I build gcc. Will have to investigate... Marcus --

[Bug libgcj/31700] [JNI] -X options not recognised by JNI_CreateJavaVM

2007-04-26 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-26 23:13 --- Created an attachment (id=13452) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13452action=view) proposed patch Could you try this patch? If it works for you I will check it in. Thanks. --

[Bug libgcj/31700] [JNI] -X options not recognised by JNI_CreateJavaVM

2007-04-25 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-25 18:38 --- Yeah, this logic looks bogus. -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added