--- Comment #6 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-08-04 13:44 ---
Andrew John Hughes 2008-06-20 14:34:
What is this bug waiting on?
Tom Tromey 2007-05-24 17:18:
I think gjdoc only recently got support for generics and annotations.
So an older gjdoc is expected to fail. I haven't
--- Comment #7 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-04 18:31 ---
I didn't fix anything.
AFAIK the classpath configury still does not check versions.
I'm moving this to the classpath product.
It should be fixed there.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #8 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-04 18:32 ---
Hmm, I could not get bugzilla to change the product.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32028
--- Comment #5 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-06-20 14:34
---
Wha is this bug waiting on? The only clear bug I can see here is that the
Classpath build system (not gcc's; Classpath ./configure is invoked by the
surrounding gcj build) should be checking the version of
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-05-25 09:55 ---
Ran accros this interesting post, seems we've had this a while ...
gjdoc in libgcj
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19612
After some messing with trying to access the gjdoc SVN according to the above
advice
--- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-05-25 19:12 ---
Tom, here are the results you requested:
...
touch resources
make[4]: Leaving directory
`/opt/gcc-4_3-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libjava/classpath/lib'
Making all in doc
make[4]: Entering directory
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-24 17:18 ---
I think gjdoc only recently got support for generics and annotations.
So an older gjdoc is expected to fail. I haven't been keeping track
of gjdoc version numbers but I expect if you install a newer version
this
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-05-24 19:48 ---
The configure script ought to check for gjdoc version - I _do_ have the newest
version from using apt-get update apt-get upgrade - how are people supposed
to use the --with-gjdoc if it is not better documaented?
The gcc
