https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50895
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50895
Jackie Rosen jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50895
--- Comment #7 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 52468 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50895
Nicholas Wourms nwourms at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nwourms
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50895
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-10 11:21:04
UTC ---
A question about this build-failure. Were you using posix-threading model for
4.6 ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50895
--- Comment #5 from Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot com
2012-12-10 12:32:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
A question about this build-failure. Were you using posix-threading model for
4.6 ?
It's been a while, but I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50895
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14 20:21:59
UTC ---
Well, the 4.7 error you get here is due unsupport posix-threading support for
libjava on Windows targets. Not sure if I want to enhance libjava that it
supports
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50895
--- Comment #2 from Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot com
2012-01-24 15:29:24 UTC ---
With GCC 4.7, I get a different failure (and jni.cc hasn't been reached yet I
think), which is pthread-related (I configured with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50895
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot
