--- Comment #21 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-17 07:35 ---
Subject: Bug 41418
Author: rwild
Date: Sat Oct 17 07:34:47 2009
New Revision: 152931
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152931
Log:
Fix libgomp without --enable-languages=fortran.
libgomp/:
--- Comment #22 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-17 07:37 ---
Fixed.
--
rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #19 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-10 07:35 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Created an attachment (id=18756)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18756action=view) [edit]
ditto, but without the d'oh factor
That's what you get when you name one
--- Comment #20 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-10 17:46 ---
(In reply to comment #19)
I'll set a full
bootstrap going now just for completeness' sake,
Completed and passed check-target-libgomp without incident, by which I mean
it didn't try and run any fortran tests :)
--- Comment #16 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-08 19:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=18755)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18755action=view)
(hopefully) better patch
Gah. Initial white space isn't stripped from the case argument,
I should've known.
Can
--- Comment #17 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-08 19:37 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Created an attachment (id=18755)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18755action=view) [edit]
(hopefully) better patch
Gah. Initial white space isn't stripped from the
--- Comment #18 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-08 19:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=18756)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18756action=view)
ditto, but without the d'oh factor
That's what you get when you name one pr-41418 and the other pr41418.
Sorry
--- Comment #15 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-07 20:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=18745)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18745action=view)
global log
(In reply to comment #14)
Subject: Re: Can't build libgomp without
--enable-languages=fortran
*
--- Comment #14 from Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de 2009-10-05 05:16
---
Subject: Re: Can't build libgomp without
--enable-languages=fortran
* davek at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote on Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:26:26PM CEST:
--- Comment #13 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 21:25 ---
Bad news: the patch doesn't work. I edited the generated config.status so
that it would use bash -x when reinvoking configure as part of --recheck, and
it seems that although the code goes through the switch and
--- Comment #13 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 21:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=18680)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18680action=view)
bash -x log of configure script run
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41418
--- Comment #11 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-22 11:54 ---
I'll try and get to testing it today, but it'll be late tonight before I can
start, I've got to spend the day doing some binutils stuff. Will be back in
touch when I know something, thanks for the patch.
--
--- Comment #4 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-21 07:53 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
First off, do you happen to know whether this is a regression?
'fraid not, I never thought to try this before.
Then, please show more of the build output of the failing build:
--- Comment #3 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-21 07:46 ---
First off, do you happen to know whether this is a regression?
Then, please show more of the build output of the failing build:
everything starting from toplevel target 'configure-target-libgomp'.
You can recreate
--- Comment #5 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-21 17:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=18624)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18624action=view)
good rebuild log
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41418
--- Comment #6 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-21 17:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=18625)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18625action=view)
bad rebuild log
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41418
--- Comment #7 from Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de 2009-09-21 17:51
---
Subject: Re: Can't build libgomp without
--enable-languages=fortran
* davek at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote on Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 07:44:49PM CEST:
Created an attachment (id=18625)
--
--- Comment #8 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-21 17:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=18626)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18626action=view)
good config log
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41418
--- Comment #9 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-21 17:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=18627)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18627action=view)
bad config log
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41418
--- Comment #1 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-20 14:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=18616)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18616action=view)
diffs in generated libtool files
This looks like it might be informative.
--
--- Comment #2 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-20 14:59 ---
Perhaps the two single most salient points from that diff:
# Is the compiler the GNU compiler?
-with_gcc=no
+with_gcc=yes
# Whether we are building with GNU ld or not.
-with_gnu_ld=no
+with_gnu_ld=yes
Did not
21 matches
Mail list logo
