[Bug libgomp/60035] [PATCH] make it possible to use OMP on both sides of a fork (without violating standard)

2018-12-13 Thread njs at pobox dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 --- Comment #13 from Nathaniel J. Smith --- Unfortunately, AFAICT, the omp_pause_resource APIs don't actually solve the problem. They're fine and useful if you have a single piece of code that wants to use both omp and fork(). But, this was

[Bug libgomp/60035] [PATCH] make it possible to use OMP on both sides of a fork (without violating standard)

2018-12-13 Thread jeff.science at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 --- Comment #12 from Jeff Hammond --- I apologize for stupidly misinterpreting the automated message as something else. My email client did not show the true sender address.

[Bug libgomp/60035] [PATCH] make it possible to use OMP on both sides of a fork (without violating standard)

2018-12-13 Thread jeff.science at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 --- Comment #11 from Jeff Hammond --- Thanks for sharing. I’ve seen that bug or closely related ones before. This is definitely one of the motivating examples for this feature set. The only question is how many years before it gets adopted

[Bug libgomp/60035] [PATCH] make it possible to use OMP on both sides of a fork (without violating standard)

2018-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 9 has omp_pause_resource and omp_pause_resource_all APIs as required by OpenMP 5.0 for this.

[Bug libgomp/60035] [PATCH] make it possible to use OMP on both sides of a fork (without violating standard)

2017-11-17 Thread pouar at pouar dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 pouar at pouar dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pouar at pouar dot net ---

[Bug libgomp/60035] [PATCH] make it possible to use OMP on both sides of a fork (without violating standard)

2014-04-05 Thread larsmans at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 larsmans at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||larsmans at gmail dot com ---

[Bug libgomp/60035] [PATCH] make it possible to use OMP on both sides of a fork (without violating standard)

2014-04-05 Thread njs at pobox dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 Nathaniel J. Smith njs at pobox dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #32019|0 |1 is

[Bug libgomp/60035] [PATCH] make it possible to use OMP on both sides of a fork (without violating standard)

2014-04-05 Thread njs at pobox dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 --- Comment #6 from Nathaniel J. Smith njs at pobox dot com --- (In reply to larsmans from comment #4) Nathaniel, could you apply the cosmetic changes suggested at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg00860.html? I'd hate to see this

[Bug libgomp/60035] [PATCH] make it possible to use OMP on both sides of a fork (without violating standard)

2014-04-05 Thread larsmans at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 --- Comment #7 from larsmans at gmail dot com --- Phase 1? (Not familiar with the GCC dev cycle.)

[Bug libgomp/60035] [PATCH] make it possible to use OMP on both sides of a fork (without violating standard)

2014-04-05 Thread njs at pobox dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 --- Comment #8 from Nathaniel J. Smith njs at pobox dot com --- (In reply to larsmans from comment #7) Phase 1? (Not familiar with the GCC dev cycle.) Sorry, meant stage 1. GCC trunk is (IIUC) currently in RC-bug-fixes-only pre-release freeze

[Bug libgomp/60035] [PATCH] make it possible to use OMP on both sides of a fork (without violating standard)

2014-02-13 Thread gcc-bugs at warnes dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 Gregory R. Warnes gcc-bugs at warnes dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc-bugs at

[Bug libgomp/60035] [PATCH] make it possible to use OMP on both sides of a fork (without violating standard)

2014-02-12 Thread njs at pobox dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 --- Comment #2 from Nathaniel J. Smith njs at pobox dot com --- Good point -- sent. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg00813.html

[Bug libgomp/60035] [PATCH] make it possible to use OMP on both sides of a fork (without violating standard)

2014-02-06 Thread conradsand.arma at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 Conrad conradsand.arma at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||conradsand.arma