[Bug libgomp/64707] FAIL: libgomp.c/target-9.c with -ftree-parallelize-loops=0

2015-01-23 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64707 --- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Fri Jan 23 12:53:55 2015 New Revision: 220037 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220037&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Make fopenmp an LTO option 2015-01-23 Tom de Vries PR l

[Bug libgomp/64707] FAIL: libgomp.c/target-9.c with -ftree-parallelize-loops=0

2015-01-23 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64707 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgomp/64707] FAIL: libgomp.c/target-9.c with -ftree-parallelize-loops=0

2015-01-22 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64707 --- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 34535 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34535&action=edit tentative patch, makes fopenmp an LTO option, adds lto-wrapper handling

[Bug libgomp/64707] FAIL: libgomp.c/target-9.c with -ftree-parallelize-loops=0

2015-01-21 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64707 --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 34515 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34515&action=edit tentative patch, adding flag_ltrans || flag_wpa to the GOMP builtin guard conditions (In reply to Jak

[Bug libgomp/64707] FAIL: libgomp.c/target-9.c with -ftree-parallelize-loops=0

2015-01-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64707 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Wouldn't it be better to just add || flag_ltrans || flag_wpa to the GOMP/GOACC builtin guard conditions? I mean, relying on global flags here when they are combined from many sources, where some may be compil

[Bug libgomp/64707] FAIL: libgomp.c/target-9.c with -ftree-parallelize-loops=0

2015-01-21 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64707 --- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 34512 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34512&action=edit tentative patch