[Bug libgomp/82124] FAIL: libgomp.c++/pr69393.C (test for excess errors)

2017-09-07 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82124 --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > I think this is a dup, the testcase uses -flto. > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 82005 *** Oh OK, I'm guessing a lot of the other new

[Bug libgomp/82124] FAIL: libgomp.c++/pr69393.C (test for excess errors)

2017-09-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82124 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgomp/82124] FAIL: libgomp.c++/pr69393.C (test for excess errors)

2017-09-06 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82124 --- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager --- Created attachment 42139 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42139=edit Full testresults diff (attaching the full diff between the 2 test logs to remind myself to open other bugs for the

[Bug libgomp/82124] FAIL: libgomp.c++/pr69393.C (test for excess errors)

2017-09-06 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82124 --- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager --- Created attachment 42138 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42138=edit bzipped libgomp.log Oops, the log was too big to attach on its own; trying again after compressing it...